HT04 - Lawful Interception - Revision history

Almagia: /* Concerned WGs/WI */

2015-08-12T09:41:45Z

Concerned WGs/WI

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 12 August 2015
Line 44:		Line 44:
	=Concerned WGs/WI=		=Concerned WGs/WI=
	SEC WG:		SEC WG:

	[http://webapp.etsi.org/WorkProgram/Report_WorkItem.asp?WKI_ID=44555 SEC004 - Lawful Interception Implications] - [http://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/Open/Drafts/SEC004/ Latest draft]		[http://webapp.etsi.org/WorkProgram/Report_WorkItem.asp?WKI_ID=44555 SEC004 - Lawful Interception Implications] - [http://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/Open/Drafts/SEC004/ Latest draft]

Almagia: /* Description */

2015-08-12T09:41:12Z

Description

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 12 August 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:

	# '''Administrative isolation:''' creating two layers of administration functionality for a given workload+host combination, where no leakage of information from one layer to the other is possible.		# '''Administrative isolation:''' creating two layers of administration functionality for a given workload+host combination, where no leakage of information from one layer to the other is possible.

	# '''Secured execution:''' delivering confidentiality and integrity of instructions and data within an area of process space based on a hardware root-of-trust.		# '''Secured execution:''' delivering confidentiality and integrity of instructions and data within an area of process space based on a hardware root-of-trust.

Almagia: /* Description */

2015-08-12T09:40:45Z

Description

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:40, 12 August 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* Proofs of Concept(s) to show Lawful Interception capabilities in conjunction with NFV		* Proofs of Concept(s) to show Lawful Interception capabilities in conjunction with NFV

	~~[https://docbox~~.~~etsi.org/ISG/NFV/TSC/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2015//NFVTSC(15)000043_SEC_WG_Hot_Topic__Lawful_Interception.docx HT#4 (SEC) Lawful Interception]~~		Specifically in terms of the key issues for LI, we would like to see PoCs address the problem of providing a secure platform to host sensitive workloads.

	~~Specifically in terms of the key issues for LI, we would like you to try to address the problem of providing a secure platform to host sensitive workloads.~~
	It is fundamental to the success of NFV that industry is able to offer viable solutions to these challenges.		It is fundamental to the success of NFV that industry is able to offer viable solutions to these challenges.

	NFV-critical functionality (for example LI) is dependent on both:		NFV-critical functionality (for example LI) is dependent on both:

	# Administrative isolation: creating two layers of administration functionality for a given workload+host combination, where no leakage of information from one layer to the other is possible.		# '''Administrative isolation:''' creating two layers of administration functionality for a given workload+host combination, where no leakage of information from one layer to the other is possible.
	# Secured execution: delivering confidentiality and integrity of instructions and data within an area of process space based on a hardware root-of-trust.
			# '''Secured execution:''' delivering confidentiality and integrity of instructions and data within an area of process space based on a hardware root-of-trust.

			[https://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/TSC/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2015//NFVTSC(15)000043_SEC_WG_Hot_Topic__Lawful_Interception.docx HT#4 (SEC) Lawful Interception]

	= Status =		= Status =

Almagia: /* Description */

2015-08-12T09:39:18Z

Description

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 12 August 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:

	[https://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/TSC/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2015//NFVTSC(15)000043_SEC_WG_Hot_Topic__Lawful_Interception.docx HT#4 (SEC) Lawful Interception]		[https://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/TSC/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2015//NFVTSC(15)000043_SEC_WG_Hot_Topic__Lawful_Interception.docx HT#4 (SEC) Lawful Interception]

			Specifically in terms of the key issues for LI, we would like you to try to address the problem of providing a secure platform to host sensitive workloads.
			It is fundamental to the success of NFV that industry is able to offer viable solutions to these challenges.

			NFV-critical functionality (for example LI) is dependent on both:

			# Administrative isolation: creating two layers of administration functionality for a given workload+host combination, where no leakage of information from one layer to the other is possible.
			# Secured execution: delivering confidentiality and integrity of instructions and data within an area of process space based on a hardware root-of-trust.

	= Status =		= Status =

Almagia: /* Coordinator */

2015-08-11T14:13:16Z

Coordinator

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 11 August 2015
Line 40:		Line 40:

	=Coordinator=		=Coordinator=
	~~SEc~~ WG co-chair: Mike Bursell (Intel) [mailto:mike.bursell@intel.com mike.bursell@intel.com]		SEC WG co-chair: Mike Bursell (Intel) [mailto:mike.bursell@intel.com mike.bursell@intel.com]

	=Contributions (feedback) deadline=		=Contributions (feedback) deadline=
	Q2 2016		Q2 2016

Almagia: /* Points to prove/refute */

2015-08-11T14:13:05Z

Points to prove/refute

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 11 August 2015
Line 19:		Line 19:
	** Security		** Security
	* What other impacts may exist?		* What other impacts may exist?


	==Criterion of success==		==Criterion of success==

Almagia: Created page with "= Description = Many regulatory authorities require operators to provide Lawful Interception capabilities. This Hot Topic aims to drive: * Understanding the impact of virtual..."

2015-08-11T14:12:52Z

Created page with "= Description = Many regulatory authorities require operators to provide Lawful Interception capabilities. This Hot Topic aims to drive: * Understanding the impact of virtual..."

New page

= Description =
Many regulatory authorities require operators to provide Lawful Interception capabilities. This Hot Topic aims to drive:
* Understanding the impact of virtualisation on the regulatory requirements of Lawful Interception
* Exploration of architectures and designs to allow Lawful Interception capabilities to be provided in NFV deployments
* Proofs of Concept(s) to show Lawful Interception capabilities in conjunction with NFV

[https://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/TSC/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2015//NFVTSC(15)000043_SEC_WG_Hot_Topic__Lawful_Interception.docx HT#4 (SEC) Lawful Interception]

= Status =
<span style="color:green;">'''ACTIVE'''</span>

= What is expected to be learnt from the NFV PoCs =

==Points to prove/refute==
* How does virtualisation impact the requirements for Lawful Interception?
* What impacts are there on NFV deployments in terms of:
** Performance
** Management
** Security
* What other impacts may exist?

==Criterion of success==
* Presentation of architectures to provide Lawful Interception capabilities that are acceptable to Law Enforcement Agencies and deployable by operators

= Technical information to be provided by the PoC Team=
* Description of how requirements in SEC009 are met
* Overall architecture and use case descriptions
* Specifics on the issues faced
* Specifics on the solutions provided
* Specifics on the lessons learnt

PoC Teams shall follow the [[Media:HT_4_FB_Template.doc | HT#4 Feedback Template]] on their contributions to Hot Topic#4

=Concerned WGs/WI=
SEC WG:
[http://webapp.etsi.org/WorkProgram/Report_WorkItem.asp?WKI_ID=44555 SEC004 - Lawful Interception Implications] - [http://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/Open/Drafts/SEC004/ Latest draft]

[http://webapp.etsi.org/WorkProgram/Report_WorkItem.asp?WKI_ID=46661 SEC009 - Use cases and technical approaches for multi-layer host administration] - [http://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/Open/Drafts/ Latest draft]

=Coordinator=
SEc WG co-chair: Mike Bursell (Intel) [mailto:mike.bursell@intel.com mike.bursell@intel.com]

=Contributions (feedback) deadline=
Q2 2016