NSB Discussion Scope: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:07, 23 April 2014

When the draft proposal for NFV Phase 2 was presented at Malaga, concerns were raised related to the constitution of the new NVF Steering Board (NSB)and associated decision rights. This discussion intents to open the discussion on this topic. Comments are especially requested to (but not restricted to) the following questions:

What is a reasonable size of the NSB (number of participants) and how to achieve a fair representation of the different types of companies represented within the ETSI ISG NFV?
What should the NSB be able to decide, and which decisions should be still left to the ISG NFV plenary?

To view POSTs, login with your ETSI Online account!

Revision as of 09:06, 23 April 2014 (view source) Almagia (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:07, 23 April 2014 (view source) Almagia (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	# What should the NSB be able to decide, and which decisions should be still left to the ISG NFV plenary?		# What should the NSB be able to decide, and which decisions should be still left to the ISG NFV plenary?

	[http://nfvwiki.etsi.org/index.php?title=Special%3AUserLogin&returnto=Special%3AAWCforum%2Fsf%2Fid6%2FBuilding+PoC+Teams.html To view POSTs, login with your ETSI Online account!]		[http://nfvwiki.etsi.org/index.php?title=Special%3AUserLogin&returnto=Special%3AAWCforum%2Fsf%2Fid6%2FBuilding+PoC+Teams.html To view POSTs, login with your ETSI Online account!]