Scalable Service Chaining Technology for Flexible Use of Network Functions: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== PoC Proposal == | == PoC Proposal == | ||
[http://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2015//NFV(15)000013r1_Scalable_Service_Chaining_Technology_for_Flexible_Use_of_Net.docx NFV(15)000013r1_Scalable_Service_Chaining_Technology_for_Flexible_Use_of_Net.docx] | [http://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2015//NFV(15)000013r1_Scalable_Service_Chaining_Technology_for_Flexible_Use_of_Net.docx NFV(15)000013r1_Scalable_Service_Chaining_Technology_for_Flexible_Use_of_Net.docx] | ||
[[media:PoC_proposal_Scalable_Service_Chaining-revisedv3(final).pdf |Download PDF version]] | |||
==PoC Report== | |||
Final PoC Report (31/03/2015): [https://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/TST/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2015//NFVTST(15)000045_Final_Report_PoC_33_Scalable_Service_Chaining_Technology_for.docx NFVTST(15)000045_Final_Report_PoC_33_Scalable_Service_Chaining_Technology_for.docx] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:40, 8 April 2015
PoC Team
NTT
ALAXALA Networks
Hitachi
Cisco Systems
NEC
Alcatel-Lucent
Main Contact
Konomi Mochizuki, NTT mochizuki.konomi@LAB.NTT.CO.JP
PoC Demo
NTT R&D Forum 2015, February 19
Abstract
This PoC will verify that Service Function Chaining (SFC) is effective to implement the VNF Forwarding Graph. Also, by using functions for SFC provided by several vendors, we will verify the interoperability of SFC. Moreover, this PoC will verify that flexible use of the network function is possible by using VNF Forwarding Graph with SFC.
PoC Proposal
NFV(15)000013r1_Scalable_Service_Chaining_Technology_for_Flexible_Use_of_Net.docx
PoC Report
Final PoC Report (31/03/2015): NFVTST(15)000045_Final_Report_PoC_33_Scalable_Service_Chaining_Technology_for.docx